Please mark your calendars and Save the Date for the Chapter’s annual gathering and fundraiser, Spring Fling 2018.
In a win for city activists, the Manhattan District Attorney and NYPD have tossed a controversial policy that allowed police lawyers to prosecute protest arrest cases with the goal of limiting lawsuit liability.
The backpedaling came days after lawmakers sent a hard-charging letter to DA Cy Vance Jr. blasting his office’s February 2016 order which authorized the police department’s Legal Bureau to play prosecutor in summons cases.
Typically, there isn’t a prosecutor in summons court so the addition of one was considered a bullying tactic and a disadvantage to select defendants in small-time public rally busts.
Attorneys for the department insisted on Black Lives Matter rally participants admitting wrongdoing in exchange for standard dismissal deals.
Admissions of that sort are not typically required in criminal court settlements known as adjournments in contemplation of dismissal or ACDs.
Normally, a defendant’s case will be dismissed and sealed after six months of good behavior without the individual admitting to anything — but police attorneys wanted the people they flagged to concede there was probable cause to make an arrest with the hope it would fend off civil claims.
In all, the NYPD handled 38 cases since the agreement went into effect.
Vance’s office notified New York State Assemblyman Dan Quart and other reps of its decision on Friday.
“Over the past several years, DA Vance has ended the criminal prosecution of tens of thousands of low-level cases and believes that summons matters are best handled by a judge or judicial hearing officer, so that limited prosecutorial resources are not expended on minor offenses,” wrote Joan Vollero, Vance’s senior advisor for intergovernmental affairs and public policy.
Activists and their advocates believed the policy was a threat to the First Amendment rights of demonstrators.
Two Back Lives Matter participants arrested in 2016 whose trials were handled by NYPD lawyers filed a lawsuit which is pending in Manhattan Supreme Court.
Demand follows rough policing of immigration-related protest on Thursday and other prior incidents of abusive police treatment of protesters
Groups seek oversight of Strategic Response Group’s role in abusive and repressive protest policing and conflation of “anti-terror” and protest
New York, NY – Following the rough policing of an immigration-related protest on Thursday and prior protests in NYC where protesters were subjected to abusive treatment and tactics, a number of civil rights, legal and other organizations recognized MLK Day by calling for the City Council to hold an oversight hearing into the policing of protests. The groups noted the NYPD’s history of abusive policing of protesters, seeking Council oversight for its current form and especially the newly created Strategic Response Group (SRG) that was established in 2015 to dually handle protests and “anti-terror.” It represents steps by the NYPD under the de Blasio administration to militarize the officers who police protests and a disturbing trend towards categorizing and criminalizing protesters as akin to “terrorists.”
“It’s important that New Yorkers be free to protest injustices, including those advanced by the Trump administration, without fear of police aggression,” said Monifa Bandele, a spokesperson for Communities United for Police Reform. “As we celebrate the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr., we must recognize his important role in protesting injustices in this country and ensure that people in our city today be allowed to do the same without hostility and suppression by police. Unfortunately, the NYPD has too frequently engaged in overly aggressive and abusive policing of protests that effectively attacks New Yorkers’ Constitutional right to protest. This was seen on Thursday as New Yorkers protested the immoral and unjust detention of Ravi Ragbir and has occurred in prior protests. The NYPD’s specialized Strategic Response Group that conflates the policing of ‘anti-terror’ with that of protests is fundamentally problematic and has been at the heart of recent oppressive policing of protests. We urge this City Council under its new Speaker to fulfill its pledge to conduct significant oversight of city agencies by holding a Public Safety Committee hearing on the policing of protests and the Strategic Response Group’s role in the NYPD’s treatment of protesters. It is ironic that Terence Monahan was elevated to the highest uniformed position in the NYPD the same week this happened, since he was found responsible as a commanding officer for leading abusive policing of protesters during the 2004 Republican National Convention, which led to the largest legal settlement for abusive protest policing in history. An internal investigation by the NYPD is inadequate, and the Intelligence Bureau’s appointment to investigate is questionable since it is not the bureau that generally investigates excessive force complaints and it is led by another commanding officer involved in the irresponsible policing of those 2004 RNC protests.”
SRG, formed in 2015, has seemingly institutionalized problematic policing of protests that had previously been used by the NYPD and led to civil rights violations. When SRG was unveiled, then-NYPD Commissioner Bratton revealed that the specialized unit would handle “anti-terror” and protests. When civil rights organizations criticized the department for this, the NYPD made a “clarification” in the following days to say that the unit would not handle both. However, that “clarification” has been proven to be untrue, as SRG has been used precisely to handle protests – and its officers were among those responsible for Thursday’s hyper-aggressive actions that Speaker Corey Johnson described as “out of control.”
This type of abusive and overly aggressive policing of protesters has occurred too frequently in the city’s history but specifically during the de Blasio administration with the involvement of SRG. It has occurred at smaller scale protests that yielded less media attention and larger scale ones, like the 2015 protest when New Yorkers were brutalized while expressing outrage at the killing of Freddie Gray in Baltimore. Two state legislators were witness and subject to that abusive policing.
New York City’s history consists of several incidents where protesters were treated abusively and inappropriately by the NYPD. In 2014, the city settled for $18 million in a federal lawsuit against it related to the NYPD’s policing of protesters at the 2004 Republican National Convention in Manhattan. It was the largest settlement in history related to protest policing, according to the NYCLU, which filed the initial cases related to it. Terrence Monahan, who was elevated to NYPD Chief of Department this week, was found responsible by a court and the Civilian Complaint Review Board for abusive policing during those RNC protests as one of the commanding officers. NYPD Chief of Intelligence Thomas Galati was also involved as a commanding officer during the policing of the RNC protests.
The National Lawyers Guild, NYC Chapter, stated: “In 2015, the National Lawyers Guild-NYC Chapter opposed the City Council’s funding of the Strategic Response Group (SRG), the specialized protest unit within the NYPD, arguing that a paramilitary-type unit would stifle political protest and disproportionately harm already vulnerable communities of color in NYC. Since the Council approved the funding, the SRG has grown to over 800 personnel, and funding for militarized equipment and technologies only continues to increase. While we encourage Speaker Johnson’s inquiry into the operations of the SRG, we also want the Speaker to be aware that the SRG’s aggressive tactics seen at Thursday’s protest have been frequently experienced by protestors and others around the city, most recently at a demonstration after Erica Garner’s funeral in Harlem only a few nights before Thursday’s events. In a City aspiring to enter a “New Progressive Era” there is no place for paramilitary-type tactics and the repression of political speech activity. We welcome the City Council’s close scrutiny and oversight of the NYPD’s Strategic Response Group.”
Jin Hee Lee, Deputy Director of Litigation at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) said: “Last Thursday, the public witnessed a shocking display of undue violence by NYPD officers against non-violent protesters. As our nation commemorates Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, we must not lose sight of the vital role of peaceful protest in the struggle for justice and equality. Having represented Dr. King – during the Birmingham campaign in 1963, in Selma in 1965, and elsewhere throughout the South – LDF stands firmly with all who engage in peaceful advocacy for a more fair and just society. This is especially true during these tumultuous times, when the rights of so many vulnerable and marginalized people are at risk. We urge the NYPD not only to apologize for this abuse, but also to take all necessary actions to ensure such misconduct does not happen again, and call on the City Council to hold an oversight hearing on the NYPD’s policing of protests.”
Mark Winston Griffith, Executive Director of Brooklyn Movement Center, stated: “At a time when the need for social justice action in the U.S. has seldom been more pronounced, the collapsing of anti-terrorist and protest policing under the Strategic Response Group is a threat to the exercise of democracy and the preservation of human rights. Brutality against activism should not be enshrined in the practice of so-called law-and-order. The Brooklyn Movement Center stands with CPR and all those who care about police accountability in calling on the New York City Council to schedule hearings that will result in oversight of the SRG.”
Loyda Colon, Justice Committee Co-Director, said: “We are disgusted by the hyper-aggressive, abusive policing of Thursday’s protest against the unlawful detention of Ravi Ragbir. Unfortunately, however, we are not surprised given the NYPD’s long history of abusive policing of protests and the establishment of the heavily militarized Strategic Response Group (SRG) under de Blasio. The SRG’s multi-pronged purpose- to police protests, terrorism, and “areas requiring an increased police presence”- is indicative of the administration’s move to increase the militarization of the NYPD while at the same time criminalizing low-income communities of color and New Yorkers who are exercising their first amendment rights. Over the past two years Justice Committee members have witnessed and experienced SRG officers abusing and intimidating protesters on multiple occasions, including at vigils and rallies organized by families who’ve lost loved ones to the police. We have also witnessed the SRG in subways and the streets of our neighborhoods, which has the effect of making our communities feel like occupied territory. We, therefore, are calling on the City Council to hold an oversight hearing regarding Strategic Response Group operations both during protests and in our communities.”
Carmen Perez, Founder of Justice League NYC and Co-Chair of the Women’s March, stated: “We were saddened, yet not surprised, to see the overly-aggressive and abusive policing exhibited last Thursday towards protesters, especially in the arrests of City Council members Rodriguez and Williams. This type of violent treatment of protesters has occurred too often in this city. We call on this City Council under Speaker Johnson, who witnessed the egregious behavior of the NYPD on Thursday, to keep its promise of agency oversight by holding a hearing on NYPD’s policing of protests, including the use of force and other tactics against protesters. There needs to be significant oversight of the Strategic Response Group and its role in policing protests.”
Sue Udry, Executive Director of Defending Rights & Dissent, said: “When people care enough about injustice to make their voices heard, police should respond with respect and facilitate the people’s right to assemble and speak out. A vibrant democracy depends on dissent. We are tired of the NYPD’s militarized and abusive response to protests, and call on the City Council to hold an oversight hearing about the NYPD’s policing of protests and the Strategic Response Group unit’s role in the use of abusive tactics.”
Darian Agostini, an organizer for Make the Road New York stated: “The detention of Ravi Ragbir was an inhumane act. It’s another exampled of the ongoing criminalization of Caribbean immigrants who look like like the men and women who raised me and my siblings. The actions of the hyper-militarized and aggressive NYPD officers who met peaceful protesters, calling for Ravi’s freedom, with brutal force is a reaffirmation that Black and brown Caribbean immigrants are still not seen as people deserving of living our lives with dignity and respect, but as problems to be policed and forcibly exiled from our communities.”
Onleilove Alston, Executive Director of Faith in New York, said: “As a Faith and justice organization that works on immigration we are deeply saddened at what happened to our ally Ravi and his supporters on January 11th. We know that NYC has a long history of abusive policing of protests and protesters. It wasn’t that long ago that NYC paid an $18 million settlement – the largest protest settlement in history – for the abusive policing of protesters at the 2004 Republican National Convention in Manhattan. One of our former staff Members was mishandled. This needs to stop and as people of faith we demand that our city leaders respond to this injustice.”
The Center for Constitutional Rights stated: “The hyper-militarized Strategic Response Group’s abuse and arrest of New Yorkers, including City Council Members, standing in solidarity with activist Ravi Ragbir last week is neither new nor surprising. It speaks volumes that the unit tasked with handling protests is the same unit tasked with handling “anti terror” policing. The SRG’s very scope assumes protests are inherently criminal and inevitably leads to the sort of excessive aggression we saw on Thursday. It is in perfect step with the nationwide rise in anti-protest legislation and the infiltration, surveillance, and labeling as terrorist of groups like the Movement for Black Lives and activists fighting for Palestinian rights, animal rights, and environmental justice. The City Council must hold an oversight hearing on the NYPD and SRG policing of protests. It is critical that protests aren’t policed by the same force engaged in anti-terror policing. As the Trump administration continues to abuse the rights of everyone, New Yorkers need to be able to engage in peaceful protest without fear of overzealous reactions from the police sworn to protect them.”
Dear Guild friends,
Over the last twelve months, an unprecedented era has begun, characterized by attacks on immigrants, activists and working people. Regulations protecting our environment have been gutted; and Nationalism and white supremacy have been promoted in ways unseen in generations.
It is in times like these that the progressive legal community comes together and excels. From camping out at JFK to advise targeted communities and represent those turned away or detained, to counseling religious institutions seeking to provide sanctuary, Chapter members have provided support. Our Mass Defense Committee has trained hundreds of legal observers and provided support at over one hundred demonstrations. Members are also representing activists at Standing Rock, and the Ramapough Lenape Nation in the fight against a pipeline in N.J. Chapter members have successfully challenged the NYPD’s intervention in the prosecution of activists in summons court and have strengthened anti-surveillance protections for social justice communities, including targeted Muslim communities. These are just a few of the highlights of the extraordinary work of our chapter this year. Look for details in our next newsletter and in Guild Notes.
We are very grateful to be the beating heart of a community of dedicated advocates. Our strength lies in our community of members and allies, who support each other’s efforts and share their experience and knowledge with the next generation for people’s advocates. In an era of unimaginable attacks, we need to stand together and fight against the forces of repression, xenophobia and greed.
Because the Guild is deeply invested in the practice of law for the people, we have no big foundation or corporate contributors. We depend on our members and supporters to keep up our work.
Please consider giving a year-end contribution to the NLG-NYC to help sustain our work.
You may donate online at https://nlgnyc.org/contribute/ or make a tax deductible contribution of 100. or more by sending a check payable to: The NLG-NYC Chapter Foundation, 168 Canal Street, 6th Floor, NY NY 10013
Thank you in advance for your support!
Training on providing legal assistance to people in Puerto Rico affected by Hurricane Maria.
*Traditional Format/Transitional for both newly admitted and experienced attorneys. CUNY School of Law has been certified by the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board as an Accredited Provider of Continuing Legal Education in New York State. Under CLE regulations, credit will be offered only to attorneys completing the entire program. No partial credit will be given. Attorneys attending only part of the program are not eligible for CLE credit. Attorneys arriving late are welcome to attend the program, but will not be eligible for CLE credit. CLE recipients must sign-in AND sign-out. Certificates will be sent following the program.
Couldn’t make it to this year’s #Law4thePeople convention, or want to relive it?
Watch the Video of the entire Keynote program online!
Hear the inspiring words of Winona LaDuke, as well as moving acceptance speeches of attorney Jayashri Srikantiah, recipient of the National Immigration Project’s Carol Weiss King Award, and former political prisoner and Puerto Rican Rights activist Oscar López Rivera, who received the Arthur Kinoy Award.
Thanks to all our members and supporters who attended our 80th anniversary celebration, Spring Fling 2017, and to all who supported the Chapter by becoming a sponsor, taking out a journal ad or making a donation!
The event was a great success, with inspiring words, good food, music and company!
Late Monday afternoon, U.S. District Judge Judge Charles Haight approved revised guidelines to strengthen oversight of NYC Police Dept. investigations and surveillance of First Amendment activity of New Yorkers. The ruling was the result of a joint settlement process in Handschu v. Special Services Division, the longstanding class action, and Raza v. City of New York, a case brought by members of New York’s Muslim community. The net result is a strengthening of rules the NYPD must follow when investigating political and First Amendment activity in New York City, rules the court now calls the “Revised Handschu Guidelines”.
Media reports on Monday’s ruling:
New York Times Editorial
On March 7, 2017, our sister and comrade Lynne Stewart made the transition peacefully at her home in her beloved Brooklyn with her family at her side. As many in the NLG know, Lynne was ordered released from federal prison on December 31, 2013 after a legal and political campaign to win her compassionate release due to her on-going battle with breast cancer. Doctors from both behind the wall and in the street predicted she would succumb to the disease in 6-18 months. Through strength and determination, she lived for over 36 months and was able to spend time with family and, of course, continue the work for justice that characterized her entire life.
I first came to know of Lynne in the 1980’s when she defended one of several Black and white activists charged with violating RICO laws. Her skill won an acquittal for her client, Bilal Sunni Ali. In 1985, we both were part of a defense team for a group of white activists who became known as the “Ohio 7”. Working with Lynne and the other members of the team, including Bill Kunstler and Liz Fink, both also gone, was for me an education that no amount of law school or CLE’s could come close to duplicating.
What many do not know was that Lynne was a “full service” lawyer. If you were her client, she not only fought brilliantly in court, she felt it was her responsibility to take care of her client’s needs: clothes, making sure the clients had commissary money, facilitating visits with family. On more than one occasion she hired former clients or members of their family to work in her office when they lacked income. On other times she took clients and/or the children of clients into her home when they had no place to go. Lynne had a big heart.
Since her release and especially in the last few months of her life, Lynne and her husband and partner Ralph Poynter, increasingly urged those of us in the activist-lawyer community to dedicate ourselves to fighting racism and injustice, particularly to work for the freedom of political prisoners in US jails. Our finest tribute to Lynne would be to make that a reality.
Bob Boyle, 3-8-17
Robert J. Boyle has been a solo practitioner for most of his career specializing in criminal defense, civil rights and habeas corpus cases. Much of his political/legal work has been devoted to working for the release of political prisoners in United States jails, particularly those who were targeted many years ago by the FBI’s counterintelligence program known as COINTELPRO. In 1990 he and other NLG lawyers won the release of former Black Panther Party (BPP) leader Dhoruba Bin Wahad who was imprisoned for 19 years and in 2014 he won freedom for BPP leader Marshall Eddie Conway who had been incarcerated for 44 years.
Bob was also one of the attorneys who won freedom for attorney Lynne Stewart. He is currently representing Mumia Abu Jamal in his effort to obtain necessary medical care and continues to represent still-incarcerated BPP members.
Bob has been an NLG member since 1977 and has often served on the NLG-NYC’s Executive Committee.